Photo: Trapped beavers being relocated by the Tulalip Beaver Project from an area of conflict to the upper Snoqualmie River watershed
Beaver trapping has largely shaped North America as we know it today. Historically, beavers were trapped for their pelts and scent (castoreum) glands. Their pelts were desired for their high quality wool undercoat which were fashioned into various hats. Prior to European settlement, beaver populations were estimated to be at 60-400 million across North America and, when the fur trade peaked, an estimated 1 million beavers were harvested per year (Seton, 1929, Müller-Schwarze 2011). By the 1900s beavers were nearly extinct across North America and, as a result, the wetlands where beavers once resided were drained for agriculture and human infrastructure.
After the beaver population reached near extinction, reintroduction efforts began as early as the 1930s to bring back this once prized commodity and ecosystem engineer. Idaho made headlines in the 1940s by parachuting beavers from airplanes to reestablish the population. With extensive reintroduction efforts, beavers are now returning to their historical territory along streams, rivers, and in low-laying floodplains, often overlapping in areas where humans also reside.
When conflicts arise with beavers, lethal trapping has historically been the primary form of controlling beaver damage. Trapping can provide some immediate relief to beaver dam flooding impacts but, since beavers are territorial, once a beaver family is removed and the habitat becomes available, a new beaver family will likely move in. With the expansion of coexistence techniques, such as pond levelers and culvert protection fences, trapping is not the only option to managing conflict. Coexistence measures allow beavers to remain in a landscape and, with these options available, lethal removal should only be considered in emergency situations and as the last option when it comes to managing beaver damage.
Beaver relocation is another alternative to lethal trapping in Washington. When coexistence tools have failed or are deemed inappropriate for a site, a permitted beaver relocator may relocate beavers to an area of less potential human conflict. By relocating beavers to upper watersheds, they can help restore degraded streams and wetlands by providing critical ecosystem services such as water storage, wildfire buffers, and wildlife habitat. However, similar to lethal trapping, relocation may not resolve the beaver damage since new beavers will likely move in once the habitat becomes available.
If you’d like to learn more about the best beaver management options on your property, please visit https://svpa.us/beaverwise-program/ for more information or reach out to Justine Casebolt, Beaver Conservation Manager at Justine@svpa.us.